A Procedure for Agrobacterium tumefaciens Mediated Genetic Transformation of Sweet Potato

Main Article Content

Patrick S. Michael

Abstract

Many sweet potato plants have been successfully transformed but the transgenic plants regenerated, however, have been limited to a few genotypes. Reported in this paper is a procedure in which several explants of three sweet potato genotypes from Papua New Guinea (PNG) were used to transform and regenerate transgenic plants. To achieve stable transformation, an efficient shoot regeneration system for different explants was developed. The shoot regeneration protocol developed enabled for a reproducible stable transformation mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain 1065. The plasmid pVDH65 contains the npt II gene for kanamycin (km) resistance, hpt gene for hygromycin resistance and Gus-intron reporter gene (GUS) for β-glucuronidase. Explants inoculated with the bacterial strain were co-cultured for 3, 5 and 7 days (d) in the dark on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium without growth hormones. After co-cultivation, the explants were washed in liquid MS medium containing 500 mg L-1 cefotaxime, rinsed in sterile, deionised water for 10 mins and cultured on km selection medium containing 100 mg L-1 km followed by transfer of explants to 125 mg L-1 km after 14 d of culture. The km-resistant shoots selected on the former km concentration were transferred to the latter for double selection. Km-resistant shoots obtained at 125 mg L-1 were rooted on MS based medium also containing 0.008 mg L-1 IAA, 0.03 mg L-1 kinetin and 0.001 mg L-1 folic acid. This double selection method led to effective elimination of escapes (up to 75%) and successful recovery of transgenic plants from stem explants at more than 25%, leaf discs 10% and petioles 13.3% of each sweet potato cultivar. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of the three km-resistant and GUS-positive plants revealed the presence of the expected fragment for npt II. This is the first report of successfully transforming sweet potato plants with bacterial strain 1065 and selection of transgenic plants at km concentrations higher than 100 mg L-1.

Keywords:
Crop genetic improvement, genetic transformation, sweet potato, tissue culture

Article Details

How to Cite
Michael, P. S. (2019). A Procedure for Agrobacterium tumefaciens Mediated Genetic Transformation of Sweet Potato. Asian Journal of Advances in Agricultural Research, 11(4), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaar/2019/v11i430066
Section
Original Research Article

References

Nishiyama I, Fujise K, Teramura T. Miyazaki T. Studies of sweet potato and its related species: Comparative investiga-tions on the chromosome numbers and main characters of Ipomoea species in section batatas. Japanese Journal of Breeding. 1961;11:37-43.

Sihachakr D, Haicour R, Cavalcante JM, Umboh I, Nzoghe D, Servaes A, Ucreux A. Plant regeneration in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L., Convolvulaceae). Euphytica. 1997;96:143-152.

Otani M, Shimada T. Transgenic sweet potato with agronomically important genes. In Tra Khachatourian GG, McHughen A, Scorza R, Wai-K. Nip, Hui YH. eds. Transgenic Plants and Crops. 2002;699-716.

Song Guo-Q, Honda H, Yamaguchi Ken-I. Efficient Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) from stem explants using a two-step kanamycin-hygromycin selection method. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology. 2004;40:359-365.

Michael PS. Sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.)] genetic transformation. The PNG University of Technology Reporter. 2004;3:3-4.

Harmon S, Hammett HL, Hernandez T, Pope DT. Progress in breeding and development of new varieties: Thirty years of cooperative sweet potato research 1939-1969. Southern Cooperative Series. 1970;159:817.

Martin FW, Jones A. Flowering and fertility changes in six generations of open pollinated sweet potato. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 1971;96:493-495.

Jin S, Komari T, Gordon MP, Nester E. Genes responsible for super virulence phenotype of Agrobacterium tumefaciens A281. Journal of Bacteriology. 1987; 169:4417-4426.

Ooms G, Hookaas PJJ, Moolenaar G, Schilperoort RA. Crown gall plant tumours of abnormal morphology induced by Agrobacterium tumefaciens carrying mutated octopine Ti plamids: Analysis of T-DNA functions. Gene. 1981;14:33- 50.

Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbour. New York, USA; 1989.

Edwards K, Johnstone C, Thompson CA. Simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acid Research. 1991;19: 1349-1349.

William J, Hanafey M, Rafalski A, Tingey S. Genetic analysis using amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Methods in Enzymology. 1993;218:704-740.

Otani M, Mii M, Handa T, Kamada H, Shimada T. Transformation of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) Plants by Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Plant Science. 1993;94:151-159.

Ramsay G, Kumar A. Transformation of Vicia faba cotyledon and stem tissues by Agrobacterium rhizogenes: Infected and cytological studies. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1990;41:841-847.

Owens LD, Cress DE. Genetic variability of soybean responses to Agrobacterium strains harbouring the Ti or Ri plasmids. Plant Physiology. 1985;77:87-94.

Christey MC, Sinclair BK. Regeneration of transgenic kale (Brassica oleracea var. acephala), rape (B. napus) and turnip (B. campestris var. rapifera) plants via Agrobacterium rhizogene mediated transformation. Plant Science. 1992;87: 161-169.