Effects of Strain and Skip-a-day Feed Restriction on Carcass Characteristics of Cocks at 16th Week of Age

Main Article Content

Ayodeji Fasuyi
Olawumi Simeon
Taiwo Ogunlade
Kikelomo Adegun
Oluwatoyin Alamuoye
Adebolu Adeusi


Feed restriction has been described as a management tool to limit birds’ access to feed in order to reduce feed cost without compromising their health and meat products. The present study was undertaken to assess the effects of strain of cocks and feed restriction at different ages on carcass characteristics. The study was conducted at Teaching and Research Farm of Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria for a period of 16 weeks. A total number of 180 day-old cockerels of two strains comprising Black and White plumage (90 chicks each) were procured to examine and compare their carcass characteristics. At 6th week of age, the birds were randomly distributed into four treatments with three replicates for each strain. The treatments are, T1: control (ad libitum), T2: feed restricted from 6th -7th week, T3: feed restricted from 8th -9th week and T4: feed restricted from 10th -11th week. Data collected at 16th week of age include live body weight, bled weight, dressed weight, eviscerated weight, breast weight, back muscle weight, drumstick and thigh weights. Analyzed results showed that live weight and carcass weights were not significantly (P > 0.05) affected by strain. Both strains recorded similar mean values. With regard to feed restriction, no significant (P > 0.05) effect was found for live weight and most traits with the exception of bled weight, breast muscle weight and thigh weight. However, the control and 6th week restricted birds recorded superior mean values in such cases. The study indicates that the two strains are good for increased meat production and revenue generation, while the 6th week feed restriction is suggested for maximum productivity and profit.

Feed restriction, carcass, cock, live weight, strain.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fasuyi, A., Simeon, O., Ogunlade, T., Adegun, K., Alamuoye, O., & Adeusi, A. (2020). Effects of Strain and Skip-a-day Feed Restriction on Carcass Characteristics of Cocks at 16th Week of Age. Asian Journal of Advances in Agricultural Research, 12(3), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaar/2020/v12i330082
Original Research Article


Zubair AK, Leeson S. Compensatory growth in broiler chickens: A review. World’s Poult Sci. 1996;52:189-201.

Yu MW, Robinson FE, Clandinin MT, Bodnar L. Growth and body composition of broiler chickens in response to different regimens of feed restriction. Poult Sci. 1990;69:2074-2081.

Sahraei M, Shariatmadari F. Effect of different levels of diet dilution during finisher period on broiler chickens performance and carcass characteristics. Int J Poult Sci. 2007;6:280-282.

Fanooci M, Torki M. Effects of dietary restriction on performance, carcass characteristics, white blood cell count and humoral immune response of broiler chicks. Global Veterinaria. 2010;4(3):277-282.

Azarnik A, Bojarpour M, Eslami M, Ghorbani MR, Mirzadeh K. The effect of different levels of diet protein on broilers performance in ad libitum and feed restriction methods. J. Anim and Vet. Adv. 2010;9(3):631-634.

Acar N, Sizemore FG, Leach GR, Wideman RF, Owen RI, Barbato G. Growth of broilers in response to feed restriction regimens to reduce ascites. Poult Sci. 1995;74:833-843.

Samara MH, Robinson KR, Smith MO. Interaction of feeding time and temperature and their relationship to performance of broiler breeder hens. Poult Sci. 1996;75: 34-44.

Lee KH, Leeson S. Performance of broilers fed limited quantities of feed or nutrients during seven to fourteen days of age. Poult Sci. 2001;82:446-454.

Benyi K, Acheampong-Boateng O, Norris D. Effects of strain and different skip-a- day feed restriction periods on the growth performance of broiler chickens. Trop Animal Health and Prod. 2011;43(4):871-876.

Mahmood S, Hasan S, Ahmad F, Ashraf M, Alam M, Muzaffar A. Influence of feed withdrawals for different durations on the performance of broilers in summer. Int J Agric and Bio. 2005;7(6):975-978.

Kostal L, Savory CJ, Hughes BO. Diurnal and individual variation in behaviour of restricted-fed broiler breeders. Appl Anim Behaviour Sci. 1992;32:361-374.

Savory CJ, Seawright E, Watson A. Stereotyped behaviour in broiler breeders in relation to husbandry and opioid receptor blockade. Appl Anim Behaviour Sci. 1992;32:349-360.

Habeb ARH. A comparative study of meat and egg production and some physiological aspects in some local strains of chickens. M.Sc thesis, Faculty of Agric., Cairo University, Egypt; 2007.

Enaiat M, El-Anwer M, Amina A. Salem, Eman, Abou-Eitta M. A comparative study of productive and physiological performance between two local strains of chicks. Egypt Poult Sci. 2010;30(1):297-316.

Olawumi SO, Fagbuaro SS. Productive performance of three commercial broiler genotypes reared in the Derived savannah zone of Nigeria. Int J Agric Res. 2011; 6(11):798-804.

Musa HH, Chen GH, Cheng JH, Li BC, Mekki DM. Study on carcass characteris-tics of chicken breeds raised under the intensive condition. Int J. Poul Sci. 2006; 5(6):530-53.

Jaturasitha S, Srikanchai T, Kreuzer M, Wicke M. Differences in carcass and meat characteristics between chicken indi-genous to Northern Thailand (Black boned and Thai native) and imported extensive breeds (Bresse and Rhode Island Red). Poult Sci. 2008;87:160-169.

Statistical Analysis System (SAS). SAS Users Guide. Statistics, 8th Edition, SAS Institute Cary, NC, USA; 2001.

Olawumi SO. Effects of strain and Feed Restriction at starter phase on performance of Broiler Chickens in the Humid Tropics. Int. J. Agric. Sci. and Natural Res. 2015;2(1):1-5.

Olawumi SO, Oyewole BO, Okpe AA, Amana C, Osagiri I. Carcass characteristics and cost benefits of two broiler strains as affected by duration of feed withdrawal at finisher phase. J Sci Agric. 2019;3:64-67.

Olawumi SO. Carcass characteristics of broiler chicken strains fed different levels of feed restriction during eleven to seventeen days of age. South Pacific Journal of Technology and Science. 2014;2(1):261-268.