Main Article Content
Dual (cushion and spring) compartment ginger slicing machine was developed to address the dificulties associaed with manual slicing of ginger. However, there is no establisbed operational perfomance on record for this particular machine; thus, the need for this study. To achieve this, the machine perfomance was evaluated at the Department of Agricultural and Bio-Environmental Engineering, Waziri Umaru Federal Polytechnic, Birnin Kebbi in April, 2019 interms of Slicing Efficiency and Percent Broken and Bruises at a ginger moisture content of 80.2 and 78.5%, using completely randomized Design (CRD) with 5 x 2 x 2 factorial experiment. The experiment was conducted with one horse power petrol engine. The data collected were analyzed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for significance level of the experimental factors and their interactions and those found significant were further analyzed using Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT) for mean separations at (P0.05), respectively. The results showed that, the highest mean Slicing Efficiencies for cushion and spring compartments were: 61.2 and 45.1%, respectively. The lowest mean Percent Broken and Bruises was with cushion compartment as 38.8% and 54.9% spring compartment, respectively.
2. Keith S. Ginger: An overview of health benefits. Nutrition Today. 2010;45(4):171–177.
3. Ghosh KA, Banerjee S, Mullick HI, Banerjee S. Zingiber officinale: A natural gold. International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences. 2011;2(1):283-294.
4. Langner E, Greifenberg S, Gruenewald J. Ginger: History and use. Advance in Therapy. 1988;15:25-44.
5. World Health Organisation. Traditional medicine; 2008.
6. Food and Agriculture Organization Statistics, (FAOSTAT). Production Quantity of Ginger in the World Total 2011-2016. Available:www.factfish.com/statistics/
(Retrieved 31 October, 2018)
7. Nmadu JN, Marcus PL. Efficiency of ginger production in selected local government areas of Kaduna State, Nigeria. International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics. 2012;2(1):39–52.
8. Aniyi SO. Design and evaluation of a ginger slicing machine. Journal of Agricultural Engineering and Technology (JAET). 2006;14(1):12–17.
9. Emehute JKU, Eds. Proceedings of Three Training Workshops on Ginger Production, Processing, Utilization and Marketing held at the National Roots Ginger Research Institute, Umidike. 2002;46-50.
10. Alakali JS, Satimehin AA. Moisture adsorption characteristics of Ginger (Zingiber officinale) powders. Agricultural Engineering International. The CIGR E-Journal. Manuscript 1289. 2009;10:1-19.
11. Simonyan KJ, Eke BN, Adama AB, Ehiem JC, Onwuka JC, Okafor-Yad UN, Okapara DA. Design and development of a motorized ginger rhizomes splitting machine. Journal of Applied Agricultural Research. 2014;6(1):121–130.
12. Murumkar RP, Borkar PA, Bhoyar SM, Rathod PK, Dorkar AR. Testing of turmeric slicer for potato slicing. Internal Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR). 2016;4(10): 701-709.
13. Silva FHCA, Jayatissa DN. Design and development of a ginger slicer for small scale spice processors. International Journal of Trend in Research and Development. 2017;4(1):385–389.
14. Guwo AN. Development of a ginger splitting machine. M.Sc. Thesis. Department of Agricultural Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. Published; 2008.
15. Abubakar I, Yusuf DD, Mohammed US. Design and fabrication of a portable ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) slicing machine. Presented at National Engineering Conference, Faculty of Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Held between 14th – 17th November. 2018;671-677.
16. Abuabakar I, Yusuf DD, Mohammed US, Abdulbasit Z, Agunsoye JK, Habiba AK, Bashar ZU. Performance evaluation of a portable ginger slicing machine. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports. 2019;5(3):1-8.
17. Leo A, Balogun A. Design and performance evaluation of a multi-ginger slicing machine. Paper Presented at CIGR Section VI International Symposium on Food Processing, Monitoring Technology in Bioprocesses and Food Quality Management, Potsdam, Germany, 31 August – 02 September. 2009;622–640.