Genetic Variability, Correlation and Path Coefficient Analysis in Hybrid Maize (Zea mays L.)

Mohammad Quamrul Islam Matin *

Plant Breeding Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur-1701, Bangladesh.

Mohammad Golam Hossain

Plant Breeding Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur-1701, Bangladesh.

Mohammad Anwar Hossain Khan

Tuber Crop Research Centre (TCRC), Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur-1701, Bangladesh.

Md. Mustafa Khan

Regional Wheat Research Centre (RWRC), Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur-1701, Bangladesh.

Mohammad Shaidul Haque

Metal Agro Limited, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Maksuma Akter Banu

Ministry of Agriculture, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

The goal of the current investigation was to determine correlation coefficient, path analysis and genetic variability among twenty four maize hybrids for ten characters in a Randomized Block Design (RBD) with three replications at the research field of Plant Breeding Division, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Barisal, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Bangladesh during rabi season of 2014-15.

The measured traits were Days to 50% tasseling (DT), days to 50% silking (DS), anthesis silking interval (ASI), plant height (PH), ear height (EH), days to maturity (DM), cob length (CL), cob diameter (CD), thousand seed weight (TSW) and yield(yield t/ha). Here yield was considered as dependent variable and the rest of the parameters were independent variable. The data were submitted to analysis of variance and mean values were compared by DMRT test at both 5% and 1% of probability. Positive and significant genotypic, phenotypic correlation coefficient were recorded for yield with cob diameter (rg=0.75**, rp=0.61**), cob length (rg=0.66**and rp=0.42**), plant height (rg=0.62**and rp=0.55**), ear height (rg=0.66**and rp=0.55**) and thousand seed weight (rg=0.36**and rp=0.44**). High genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV) was obtained from anthesis silking interval (17.26), yield (15.17), ear height (13.80) and thousand seed weight (9.43). The highest phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV) were observed in anthesis silking interval (26.49) followed by yield (20.51), ear height (16.19) and the lowest in days to maturity (0.70). The difference between GCV and PCV of yield indicated that the characters had some environmental influence. The highest heritability was observed for plant height (73.78) followed by ear height (72.67), thousand seed weight (59.52) and days to maturity (55.97) but the lowest heritability identified for days to silking (18.98). The characters with higher values of GCV and heritability of the aforementioned traits were indicative for selection. The plant height had the highest positive direct effect (1.34) on yield followed by days to silking (0.75), cob diameter CD (0.46) and thousand seed weight (0.41), days to maturity (0.21) and cob length (0.20) indicating the effectiveness of direct selection. Direct negative effect on yield was shown by ear height (-1.03), days to tasseling  (-0.52) and anthesis silking interval (-0.50) was indicating the effectiveness of indirect selection.

Keywords: Genetic variability, correlation, path co-efficient, maize


How to Cite

Matin, M. Q. I., Hossain, M. G., Khan, M. A. H., Khan, M. M., Haque, M. S., & Banu, M. A. (2022). Genetic Variability, Correlation and Path Coefficient Analysis in Hybrid Maize (Zea mays L.). Asian Journal of Advances in Agricultural Research, 19(4), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaar/2022/v19i4383

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gong F, Wu X, Zhang H, Chen Y, Wang W. Making better maize plants for sustainable grain production in a changing climate. Frontiers in Pant Science. 2015;6:835.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00835

Ort D, Long S. Limits on yields in the corn belt. Science. 2014;344:484-85.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1253884

You L, Guo Z, Koo J, Ojo W, Sebastian K, Tenorio MT, Wood S, Wood-Sichra U. Spatial Production Allocation Model (SPAM) 2000 Version 3 Release 1; 2012.

Available:https://MapSPAM.info

(Accessed, Sep. 28, 2013)

Alves BM, Filho AC. Genotypic correlation and path analysis in early and super-early maize genotypes. Genetics and Molecular Research. 2017;16(2):gmr16029671.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4238/gmr16029671

Barbosa MH, Carvalho IR, Szareksi VJ, Conte GG, de Pelegrin AJ, Ferrari M, da Rosa TC, Mambrin RB, Nardino M, de Oliveira AC, da Maia LC, de Souza VQ. Path analysis and canonical variables of intervarietal maize hybrids. Plant Omics Journal. 2019;12(01):1-8.

DOI:10.21475/poj.12.01.19.pt848

Yadav OP, Karjagi GC, Kumar B, Jat SL, Chawla JS, Kaul J, Huda KS, Kumar P, Yadav P, Dhillon BS. Maize improvement in India. 12th Asian Maize conference and expert consultation on ‘Maize for food, feed, nutrition and environmental security’ 30 Oct- 1Nov, 2014. Bangkok, Thailand; 2014.

DAE (Department of Agricultural Extension). Ministry of Agriculture, Khamarbari, Farmgate, Dhaka; 2019.

Cruz CD, Regazzi AJ, Carneiro PCS. Modelos Biométricos Aplicados ao Melhoramento Genético. Viçosa, UFV; 2012.

Board JE, Kang MS, Harville BG. Path analyses identify indirect selection criteria for yield of late planted soybean. Crop Science. 1997;37:879-884.

Finne MA, Rognli OA, Schjelderup I. Genetic variation in a Norwegian germplasm collection of white clover (Trifolium repens L.): Correlation and path coefficient analyses of agronomic characters. Euphytica. 2000;112:57-68.

Gravois KA, McNew RW. Genetic relationships among and selection for rice yield and yield components. Crop Science. 1993;33:249-252.

Samonte SO, Wilson LT, McClung M. Path analyses of yield and yield-related traits of fifteen diverse rice genotypes. Crop Science. 1998;38:1130-1136.

Sinebo W. Yield relationships of barleys grown in a tropical highland environment. Crop Science. 2002;42:428-437.

Quayyum MA. Bhuttar Chash Paddhati (in Bengali). In: Chowdhury, M.K. and M.A. Islam (ed.). Bhuttar Utpadan O Babohar. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Gazipur. 1993;43-48.

Dewey DR, Lu KH. A correlation and path co-efficient analysis of components of crested wheat seed production. Agronomy Journal. 1959;51:515-518.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj1959.00021962005100090002x

Sheoran OP, Tonk DS, Kaushik LS, Hasija RC, Pannu RS. Statistical software package for agricultural research workers. Department of Mathmetics Statistics, CCS HAU, Hisar. 1998; 139-143.

Matin MQI, Uddin MS, Rohman MM, Amiruzzaman M, Azad AK, Banik BR. Genetic variability and path analysis studies in hybrid maize (Zea mays L.). American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2017;8:3101-3109.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2017.812209.

Al-amin M, Azad MAK, Shovon SR, Haquue MF. Genetic variability and character association in maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology. 2019;7(8):1125-1131.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v7i8.1125-1131.2306

Alam MS, Das MK, Khair ABMA. Genetic variation, correlation and path analysis of B. juncea (Lo). Bangladesh Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics. 1988;1(1&2):116-122.

Begum S, Ahmed A, Omy SH, Rohman MM, Amiruzzaman M. Genetic variability, character association and path analysis in maize (Zea mays L.). Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research. 2016;41(1):173-182.

Ali Q, Elahi M, Ahsan M, Tahir MHN, Basra SMA. Genetic evaluation of maize (Zea mays L.) associations for growth related seedlings traits. International Journal for Agro Veterinary and Medical Sciences. 2012;6(3):164-172.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijavms.20110608051727.

Moulin S, Baret F, Bruguier N, Bataille. Assessing the vertical distribution of leaf chlorophyll content in a maize crop. INRA- Unite Climate, Soil, Environment (CSE). 2009;7803-7929.

Panse VG. Genetics or quantitative characters in relation to plant breeding. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding. 1957;17(1): 318-346.

Munawar M, Shahbazb M, Hammada G, Yasir M. Correlation and path analysis of grain yield components in exotic maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR); 2013.

Available:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299410580

Nataraj V, Sathi JP, Agarwal V. Correlation and path analysis in certain inbred genotypes of maize (Zea mays L.) at Varanasi. International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering and Technology. 2014;14-17.

Ojo, D.K, Omikunle, O.A, Oduwoye, O.A, Ajala, M.O. and Ogunbayo, S.A. 2006. Heritability, character correlation and path coefficient among six inbred lines of maize. World Journal of Agricultural Science. 3:352-358.

Batool Z, Danial K, Alireza PA, Forhad S. Correlation and path coefficient analysis for determining interrelationship among grain yield and related characters in corn hybrids (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences. 2012;4(20):1519-1522.

Bello OB, Abdulmaliq SY, Afolabi MS, Ige SA. Correlation and path coefficient analysis of yield and agronomic characters among open pollinated maize varieties and their F1 hybrids in a diallel cross. African Journal of Biotechnology. L. 2010;9:26332639.

Sadek SE, Ahmed MA, Abd El- Ghaney HM. correlation and path coefficient analysis in five parents inbred lines and their six white maize (Zea mays L.) single crosses developed and grown in Egypt. Journal of Applied Sciences Research. 2006;3:159-167.

Bankole F, Menkir A, Olaoye G, Olakojo O, Melaku G. Association studies between grain yield and agronomic traits of a MARS maize (Zea mays L.) population under drought and non-stress condition. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica. 2019;114/1:75–84.

DOI:10.14720/aas.2019.114.1.9

Sharma JR. Statistical and biometrical techniques in plant breeding. New Age International (Pvt.) Ltd. New Delhi, Reprint. 1988;2008:35.

Menkir A. Genetic variation for grain mineral content in tropical adapted maize inbred lines. Food Chemistry. 2008;110: 454-464.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.02.025

Malik HN, Malik SI, Hussain M, Chughtai SR, Javed HI. Genetic correlation among many quantitative characters in maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids. Journal of Agriculture and Social Sciences. 2005;1(3):262-265.

Baretta D, Nardino M, Carvalho IR, Nornberg R. Path analysis for morphological characters and grain yield of maize hybrids. Australian. Journal of Crop Science. 2016;10:1655-1661.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.2016.10.12.p7707

Wright S. Correlation and Causation. Journal of Agricultural Research. 1921;20:557-585.

Uddin MS, Ahmed A, Hossain MG, Karim ANMS, Talukder MZA, Almas T, Ahmed S, Amiruzzaman M. Selection criteria, evaluation and associated genomic regions for multiple stress tolerance (salinity, water logged, low-P) in maize. Annual Report- maize and Barley Improvement, Plant Breeding Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur-1701, Bangladesh. 2015; 220-221.

Shahidul I, Haque MM, Bhuiyan SR, Hossain S. Path coefficient analysis and correlation Coefficient effects of different characters on yield of Brassica rapa L. 2015;4(6):51-55.

DOI:10.11648/j.plant.20160406.12

Kumar V, Singh SK, Bhati PK, Sharma A, Sharma SK, Mahajan V. Correlation, path coefficient analysis in maize (Zea mays L.). Environment & Ecology. 2015;33(2A):971-975.

Pavan R, Lohithaswa HC, Gangashetty P, Shekara BG. Correlation, path coefficient analysis of grain yield and yield contributing traits in single cross hybrids of maize (Zea mays L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 2011;2:253-257.

Jakhar DS, Singh R, Kumar A. Studies on path coefficient analysis in maize (Zea mays L.) for grain yield and its attributes. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2017; 6(4):2851-2856.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.604.327

Adesoji AG, Abubakar IU, Labe DA. Character association and path coefficient analysis of maize (Zea mays L.) grown under Incorporated Legumes and Nitrogen. Journal of Agronomy. 2015;14:158-163.

DOI:10.3923/ja.2015.158.163

Johnson, Herbert W, Robinson HF, Comstock RE. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in Soybean. Agronomy Journal. 1955;47(3):14- 18.