Strategies for Preventing Environmental Mastitis in Dairy Farming: A Review

Sahu Chinmayee

ICAR-NDRI, Karnal-132001, India.

Misra Arun Kumar

ICAR-NDRI, Karnal-132001, India.

Mohanty Tushar Kumar

ICAR-NDRI, Karnal-132001, India.

Chopra Deepak *

ICAR-NDRI, Karnal-132001, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


The dairy industry must adhere to stringent international standards due to the growing demand for healthy, high-quality, and affordable dairy products worldwide. To ensure the quality of raw milk, key markers such as Bulk Milk Somatic Cell Count (BMSCC) and Total Bacterial Count (BMTBC) have become standard benchmarks. However, mastitis, the most common disease affecting dairy cows, poses a significant risk to both animal welfare and the long-term sustainability of the dairy sector. Mastitis leads to reduced milk production, increased treatment costs, milk withholding during treatment, higher labor requirements, and premature culling of affected cows. In India alone, mastitis costs the dairy industry 2.37 billion rupees annually, with subclinical mastitis accounting for approximately 70% of this loss. While contagious infections have been effectively controlled, environmental mastitis pathogens such as Streptococcus uberis, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella spp now pose the primary concern for mastitis control. The management of cow bedding materials is crucial as they serve as a significant source of exposure to these environmental infections. This review study provides a detailed discussion of environmental mastitis pathogen control, emphasizing the critical role of bedding materials in reducing the risk of exposure to these pathogens.

Keywords: Environmental mastitis, bedding material, udder health, dairy cows

How to Cite

Chinmayee , S., Kumar, M. A., Kumar , M. T., & Deepak , C. (2024). Strategies for Preventing Environmental Mastitis in Dairy Farming: A Review. Asian Journal of Advances in Agricultural Research, 24(4), 7–15.


Download data is not yet available.


Beauchemin J, Fréchette A, Thériault W, Dufour S, Fravalo P, Thibodeau A. Comparison of microbiota of recycled manure solids and straw bedding used in dairy farms in eastern Canada. J Dairy Sci. 2022;105(1):389-408.

Bradley AJ, Leach KA, Green MJ, Gibbons J, Ohnstad IC, Black DH, Payne B, Prout VE, Breen JE. The impact of dairy cows' bedding material and its microbial content on the quality and safety of milk–A cross sectional study of UK farms. Int J Food Microbiol. 2018;269:36-45.

Chaplin SJ, Tierney G, Stockwell C, Logue DN, Kelly M. An evaluation of mattresses and mats in two dairy units. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2000;66(4):263-272.

Cole KJ, Hogan JS. Environmental mastitis pathogen counts in freestalls bedded with composted and fresh recycled manure solids. J Dairy Sci. 2016;99(2):1501-1505.

Cook NB, Bennett TB, Nordlund KV. Monitoring indices of cow comfort in free-stall-housed dairy herds. J Dairy Sci. 2005;88(11):3876-3885.

Costello M, Rhee MS, Bates MP, Clark S, Luedecke LO, Kang DH. Eleven-year trends of microbiological quality in bulk tank milk. Food Prot Trends. 2003;23(5).

DeVries TJ, Aarnoudse MG, Barkema HW, Leslie KE, Von Keyserlingk MAG. Associations of dairy cow behavior, barn hygiene, cow hygiene, and risk of elevated somatic cell count. J Dairy Sci. 2012; 95(10):5730-5739.

Fávero S, Portilho FVR, Oliveira ACR, Langoni H, Pantoja JCF. Factors associated with mastitis epidemiologic indexes, animal hygiene, and bulk milk bacterial concentrations in dairy herds housed on compost bedding. Livest Sci. 2015;181:220-230.

Ferraz PFP, Leso L, Klopčič M, Barbari M, Rossi G. Properties of conventional and alternative bedding materials for dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2020;103(9):8661-8674.

Fournel S, Godbout S, Ruel P, Fortin A, Généreux M, Côté C, Landry C, Pellerin D. Production of recycled manure solids for bedding in Canadian dairy farms: I. Solid–liquid separation. J Dairy Sci. 2019; 102(2):1832-1846.

Fregonesi JA, Veira DM, Von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM. Effects of bedding quality on lying behavior of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90(12):5468-5472.

Fregonesi, J A, Veira, D M, von Keyserlingk, M A G, Weary, D M. Effects of bedding quality on lying behavior of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90; 5468–5472.

Frigon JC, Roy C, Guiot SR. Anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure with mulched switchgrass for improvement of the methane yield. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2012;35:341-349.

Fullwider WK, Palmer RW. Use of impact testing to predict softness, cow preference, and hardening over time of stall bases. J Dairy Sci. 2004;87(9):3080-3088.

Godden S, Bey R, Lorch K, Farnsworth R, Rapnicki P. Ability of organic and inorganic bedding materials to promote growth of environmental bacteria. J Dairy Sci. 2008; 91(1):151-159.

Green MJ, Green LE, Medley GF, Schukken YH, Bradley AJ. Influence of dry period bacterial intramammary infection on clinical mastitis in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2002;85(10):2589-2599.

Green MJ, Leach KA, Breen JE, Ohnstad I, Tuer S, Archer SC, Bradley AJ. Recycled manure solids as bedding for dairy cattle: a scoping study. Cattle Pract. 2014;22(2): 207-214.

Groot Antink M. Boxcompost voor koe in opmars. Veldpost. 2009;24:17.

Haley DB, Rushen J, Passillé AD. Behavioural indicators of cow comfort: activity and resting behaviour of dairy cows in two types of housing. Can J Anim Sci. 2000;80(2):257-263.

Hogan J, Smith KL. Managing environmental mastitis. Vet Clin Food Anim Pract. 2012;28(2):217-224.

Hogan JS, Bogacz VL, Thompson LM, Romig S, Schoenberger PS, Weiss WP, Smith KL. Bacterial counts associated with sawdust and recycled manure bedding treated with commercial conditioners. J Dairy Sci. 1999;82(8):1690-1695.

Hogan JS, Raubenolt L, McCormick JL, Weiss WP. Evaluation of propane flaming for reducing bacterial counts in sand bedding. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95(10):6152-6159.

Hogan JS, Smith KL. Bacteria counts in sawdust bedding. J Dairy Sci. 1997;80(8):1600-1605.

Husfeldt AW, Endres MI, Salfer JA, Janni KA. Management and characteristics of recycled manure solids used for bedding in Midwest freestall dairy herds. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95(4):2195-2203.

Jensen MB, Pedersen LJ, Munksgaard L. The effect of reward duration on demand functions for rest in dairy heifers and lying requirements as measured by demand functions. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2005;90(3-4):207-217.

Jones GM, Bailey TL. Understanding the basics of mastitis. Virginia Cooperative Extension. 2006. Publication No. 404-233. Virginia State University: 1-7.

Klaas IC, Zadoks RN. Bedding management for better udder health and milk quality. In Proceedings, International Bovine Mastitis Conference. Università Degli Studi Di Milano. 2018. Milan, Italy: 45-57.

Krawczel P, Grant R. Effects of cow comfort on milk quality, productivity and behavior. In National Mastitis Council Annual Meeting Proceedings. 2009;48:15–24.

Kristula MA, Dou Z, Toth JD, Smith BI, Harvey N, Sabo M. Evaluation of free-stall mattress bedding treatments to reduce mastitis bacterial growth. J Dairy Sci. 2008;91(5):1885-1892.

Kristula MA, Rogers W, Hogan JS, Sabo M. Comparison of bacteria populations in clean and recycled sand used for bedding in dairy facilities. J Dairy Sci. 2005;88(12):4317-4325.

Kristula, M A, Dou Z, Toth J D, Smith B I, Harvey N, and Sabo M. Evaluation of free-stall mattress bedding treatments to reduce mastitis bacterial growth. Journal of dairy sci. 2008; 91(5): 1885-1892.

Lombard JE, Tucker CB, Von Keyserlingk MAG, Kopral CA, Weary DM. Associations between cow hygiene, hock injuries, and free stall usage on US dairy farms. J Dairy Sci. 2010;93(10):4668-4676.

Manninen E, de Passillé AM, Rushen J, Norring M, Saloniemi H. Preferences of dairy cows kept in unheated buildings for different kind of cubicle flooring. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2002;75(4):281-292.

Nguyen T T, Wu H, Nishino N. An investigation of seasonal variations in the microbiota of milk, feces, bedding, and airborne dust. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2020;33(11):1858-1865.

O'May GA, Reynolds N, Macfarlane GT. Effect of pH on an in vitro model of gastric microbiota in enteral nutrition patients. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71(8):4777-4783.

Pantoja J C, Hulland C, Ruegg P L. Somatic cell count status across the dry period as a risk factor for the development of clinical mastitis in the subsequent lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 2009; 92:139–148.

Patel K, Godden SM, Royster E, Crooker BA, Timmerman J, Fox L. Relationships among bedding materials, bedding bacteria counts, udder hygiene, milk quality, and udder health in US dairy herds. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102(11):10213-10234.

Pol M, Ruegg PL. Relationship between antimicrobial drug usage and antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive mastitis pathogens. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90(1):262-273.

Proietto RL, Hinckley LS, Fox LK, Andrew SM. Evaluation of a clay-based acidic bedding conditioner for dairy cattle bedding. J Dairy Sci. 2013;96(2):1044-1053.

Raffaelli M, Fontanelli M, Fransconi C, Sorelli F, Peruzzi A. Thermal disinfection of poultry grow-out facilities in central northern Italy. In: Proceedings of XVIIth World Congress of the International Commission of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering. 2010. Québec City, QC, Canada: 1-8.

Rathod P, Shivamurty V, Desai AR. Economic losses due to subclinical mastitis in dairy animals: A study in Bidar district of Karnataka. Indian J Vet Sci Biotechnol. 2017;13(1):37-41.

Ray T, Gaire T N, Dean C J, Rowe S, Godden S M, Noyes N R. The microbiome of common bedding materials before and after use on commercial dairy farms. Anim Microbiome 2022, 7;4(1):18.

Reich LJ, Weary DM, Veira DM, Von Keyserlingk MAG. Effects of sawdust bedding dry matter on lying behavior of dairy cows: A dose-dependent response. J Dairy Sci. 2010;93(4):1561-1565.

Reich, L J, Weary D M, Veira D M, von Keyserlingk M A G. Effects of sawdust bedding dry matter on lying behavior of dairy cows: A dose-dependent response. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 1561–1565.

Reinemann DJ. Troubleshooting high bacteria counts in bulk milk: What needs cleaning, the machine or the cows? Countdown Meet. Melbourne, Australia; 2011.

Rowbotham RF, Ruegg PL. Association of bedding types with management practices and indicators of milk quality on larger Wisconsin dairy farms. J Dairy Sci. 2015; 98(11):7865-7885.

Rowbotham RF, Ruegg PL. Associations of selected bedding types with incidence rates of subclinical and clinical mastitis in primiparous Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2016;99:4707– 4717.

Ruegg PL. A 100-year review: Mastitis detection, management, and prevention. J Dairy Sci. 2017;100:10381–10397.

Ruud LE, Bøe KE, Østerås O. Associations of soft flooring materials in free stalls with milk yield, clinical mastitis, teat lesions, and removal of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2010;93(4):1578-1586.

Sahu C, Manimaran A, Kumaresan A, Rajendran D, Ezhuthupurakkal PB, Sharma D, Dey DK, Sivaram M. Supplementation of trisodium citrate improves recovery rate of subclinical mastitis in crossbred cows. Pharma Innov J. 2022;11(11):1023-1030.

Sahu C, Manimaran A, Kumaresan A, Rajendran D, Sivaram M. Role of Trisodium Citrate and Nanominerals in Mastitis Management in Dairy Animals: A Review. Agric Rev. 2023;R-2612:1-8.

Sanderson MA, Adler PR, Boateng AA, Casler MD, Sarath G. Switchgrass as a biofuels feedstock in the USA. Can J Plant Sci. 2006;86(Special Issue):1315-1325.

Sapp SG, Arnot C, Fallon J, Fleck T, Soorholtz D, Sutton‐Vermeulen M, Wilson JJ. Consumer trust in the US food system: an examination of the recreancy theorem. Rural Sociol. 2009;74(4):525-545.

Seegers H, Fourichon C, Beaudeau F. Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds. Vet Res. 2003;34(5):475-491.

Sharif A, Umer MUHAMMAD, Muhammad GHULAM. Mastitis control in dairy production. J Agric Soc Sci. 2009;5(3):102-105.

Smith KL, Hogan JS. The world of mastitis. In Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Mastitis and Milk Quality. Vancouver, Canada. 2001:13.

Tucker CB, Weary DM, Fraser D. Effects of three types of free-stall surfaces on preferences and stall usage by dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2003;86(2):521-529.

Tucker CB, Weary DM, Von Keyserlingk MAG, Beauchemin KA. Cow comfort in tie-stalls: Increased depth of shavings or straw bedding increases lying time. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92(6):2684-2690.

Van Gastelen S, Westerlaan B, Houwers DJ, Van Eerdenburg FJCM. A study on cow comfort and risk for lameness and mastitis in relation to different types of bedding materials. J Dairy Sci. 2011; 94(10):4878-4888.

Van Weyenberg S, Ulens T, De Reu K, Zwertvaegher I, Demeyer P, Pluym L. Feasibility of Miscanthus as alternative bedding for dairy cows. Vet Med. 2015; 60(3).

Werven TV. New Developments in Mastitis Research. In proceedings of WCDS Advances in Dairy Technology. 2018;30: 299-306.

Wolfe T, Vasseur E, DeVries TJ, Bergeron R. Effects of alternative deep bedding options on dairy cow preference, lying behavior, cleanliness, and teat end contamination. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101 (1):530-536.

Zdanowicz M, Shelford JA, Tucker CB, Weary DM, Von Keyserlingk MAG. Bacterial populations on teat ends of dairy cows housed in free stalls and bedded with either sand or sawdust. J Dairy Sci. 2004; 87(6):1694-1701.

Zehner MM, Farnsworth RJ, Appleman RD, Larntz K, Springer JA. Growth of environmental mastitis pathogens in various bedding materials. J Dairy Sci. 1986;69(7):1932-1941.

Ferreira Ponciano Ferraz P, Araújo e Silva Ferraz G, Leso L, Klopčič M, Rossi G, Barbari M. Evaluation of the Physical Properties of Bedding Materials for Dairy Cattle Using Fuzzy Clustering Analysis. Animals. 2020; 10(2):351.